Health and Happiness First

Paul Schmidt understood that a bioresonance response can be positive or negative, depending on the intensity of the frequencies and the shape of the oscillating waves. A natural oscillation such as that from sunlight has a sine wave which is harmonious with living organisms. But the same frequency with a square-wave oscillation, such as that typically emitted by digital mobile communications systems, can cause energy deficits.



Schmidt found through experience that the harmonic sine wave produces the most beneficial, harmonising effect, without the possibility of causing any harm. Putting his knowledge into application, he invented a unique bioresonance system using dipole antennae that can produce frequency spectra in natural, harmonious sine waves.

• A 2019 double-blind, randomised controlled study provided scientific proof that the Polar 4.0 bioresonance device was safe and effective for treating patients with cervical spine syndrome (CSS). A summary of the clinical study and the full report in English are available.

• A 2014 study of the bioresonance effect of the Mini-Rayonex on cell cultures was done by Dartsch Scientific GmbH (Institute of Cell Biological Test Systems). The in vitro study showed that cell metabolism was stimulated by 45% after 24 hours exposure to the Mini-Rayonex compared to controls, and wound healing was sped up by 20% after 3 days exposure. A full report in English is available. There is also a one-minute time-lapsed video on wound healing with and without a Mini-Rayonex from the same experiment.

• A 2011 efficacy study of Rayonex devices including the Polar and the PS10, using 7,000 cell cultures of human fibroblasts and keratinocytes, was done by the Fraunhofer Institute in Dresden. Results showed bioresonance treatments increased metabolic activity of fibroblasts by up to 8%, and increased wound-healing cell division activity of damaged cells by 40%. A further finding was that there were no morphological changes to all the treated cells, showing that influence from the devices did not cause any side effects. A summary report in English is available.

• A 2011 study of the Polar’s effectiveness in pain relief was conducted by Dr Axel Schußmann and Dr Karin Schußmann, who published a report of 30 cases. After an average of 12.4 Polar treatments, each between 20-45 minutes, over an average of 32 days, the patients with various pain symptoms reported overall improvement in pain relief. The average starting pain score of 7.8 on a scale of 1-10 dropped to 4.4 at the end of the treatment period, and dropped further to an average of 2.5 in follow-up visits after an average of 38 days. A full report in English is available.